{"has_more":true,"total_items":11,"items":[{"issue":1,"vg_id":0,"published_date":2003,"journal":"See 4 MCCARTHY ON TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION","title":"This may be an overly hopeful interpretation of the Court's reference to the \"false representation\" claim, however. The Court evoked a deceptive description of the qualities of the goods: Dastar might be liable if it advertised its version as \"quite different,\" when in fact it was largely the same. By the same token, one might contend that if Dastar had significantly altered the contents of the films, but promoted them as the unaltered work of Fox, a § 43(a)(1)(B) claim might lie"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2004,"journal":"this interpretation \"reduces everything the court said to a jejune exercise in pleading\"); on the other hand, see id. at 43-44 (where misrepresentation of authorship is material to purchasing decision","volume":1,"authors":[{"author_name":"L Depaul"},{"author_name":" Rev"}]},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Although the Court stated that a \"false representation\" claim remained available, at least with respect to the advertised description of the qualities of the goods, the assertion may be inconsistent with the Court's interpretation of \"goods\" as meaning physical copies, rather than intellectual output. See The Right to Claim Authorship"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":1994,"page_from":100,"authors":[{"author_name":" Ownership"},{"author_name":" The"},{"author_name":" Of"},{"author_name":" In"},{"author_name":" Netherlands"}],"page_to":119,"doi":"https://doi.org/10.18356/1fae194d-en-fr"}]}