{"has_more":false,"total_items":2,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"published_date":1971,"journal":"Under the Supreme Court's applicable precedents, including the general Anderson-Burdick balancing test, a threshold that a candidate must meet in order to appear on the government's ballot must be","authors":[{"author_name":"E G See"},{"author_name":" Jenness V. Fortson"}]},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2007,"journal":"Structuring Judicial Review of Election Mechanics","title":"At that point, a 5% electronic signature threshold to advance to the next stage, or even 10% threshold, would not be a \"burden\" under Anderson-Burdick balancing, but simply the government's mechanism for winnowing the field of candidates in a multistage process. Because in this context, electronic signature gathering-unlike handwritten signature gathering-would function as a preliminary stage of electoral competition governed by approval voting, where candidates faced no obstacles to participating in this approval voting process (all candidates would be essentially on the ballot for the approval voting stage), this system should easily pass Anderson-Burdick review","authors":[{"author_name":"See Christopher Elmendorf"}]}]}