{"has_more":true,"total_items":37,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"authors":[{"author_name":"Q61 Q33"},{"author_name":"Q89"}],"doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0254(80)93656-0"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Among the remaining 4 unique interviewees, two believed that it might depend on the circumstances in which force was used but would have preferred to consult a lawyer on this point, Interviews 15, 16; one did not address the question of congressional authorization, Interview 9; and one took a categorial position that the President could use force at any time, subject only to Congress' power to cut off funding for any such activity"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"the Constitution made it clear that \"the President can use force any time, and Congress can stop it with the power of the purse"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2019,"journal":"FN question text 173 There were 7 scenarios in which the host state refused to consent (Q71, 75, 79","volume":83,"title":"Across all no-consent scenarios, 70 answers favored authorization, and 48 opposed (total 118), making respondents likely to favor authorization in these circumstances roughly 60% of the time. Across all scenarios in which states had consented","authors":[{"author_name":"G"},{"author_name":"Claus Kress"}]}]}