{"has_more":true,"total_items":42,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2019,"journal":"REUTERS","doi":"https://doi.org/10.21236/ada280685"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":"2019-01-25","journal":"China and Hong Kong entered into an arrangement regarding reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, although the arrangement is not yet effective. See Mun Yeow, Hong Kong: Arrangement on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters","title":"Exclusion of the SFC means that the treaty is likely to have little effect because, as we explained, public shareholders do not typically bring claims in Hong Kong. Even if shareholders bring such an action and get a judgment in Hong Kong, a Chinese court can refuse to enforce the treaty on grounds that enforcement would be \"manifestly contrary to the basic legal principles of Mainland law or the social and policy interests of the Mainland"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":"2016-07","journal":"There is a litigation information-sharing treaty between China and Hong Kong. See Arrangement on Mutual Taking of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Matters between the Courts of the Mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region","page_from":5,"title":"But it excludes administrative litigation, and thus actions by the SFC, see Consultation Paper, Hong Kong Dep't of Just., Proposed Arrangement Between Hong Kong and the Mainland on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters","page_to":6},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"See Evidence Arrangement, art. 3. We have been told that China's CSRC sometimes shares audit papers with the SFC"}]}