{"has_more":true,"total_items":9,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"published_date":"2015-07-21","journal":"It is not consistent with these instructions to require a plaintiff demonstrating antitrust injury to prove precisely what would have happened (in a but-for world that, by denition","volume":4459607,"title":"has not occurred), particularly where the Court emphasized analysis of the payment rather than the patent and where the \"risk of competition\" could be sacriced even pursuant to patents that were likely to ultimately be held valid and infringed"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"The court also seemed to contradict itself when it rst claimed that","title":"But when it comes to this proposed alternative history, plaintiffs' use of the word \"could\" instead of \"would\" is not merely semantic; it signals that they do not intend to prove that prices were going to fall butfor the litigation. They have conceived of a world where that might have happened, but conceivable falls short of plausible"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"In short, in dismissing the plaintiffs' claims on sham behavior, unlawful settlements, and antitrust injury on erroneous grounds, the Humira court did not do any favors to future courts addressing these challenging issues or to consumers suffering from this potentially anticompetitive conduct"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":1965,"journal":"Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Indus","authors":[{"author_name":"' Prof"}]}]}