{"has_more":true,"total_items":15,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Entm't Inc. v. RDR Books, 575 F. Supp. 2d","volume":513,"title":"2008) (regarding the Harry Potter Lexicon, distinguishing between copying for the purpose of writing about the source work","authors":[{"author_name":"E G See"},{"author_name":"Warner Bros"}]},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"this instance, it would seem the author's complaint focuses on the critic's opinion, rather than on any copying the critic may have engaged in to support his opinion"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"501(b) (2018) (legal or beneficial owner is entitled to institute an action for infringement)"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Unless she is a \"beneficial copyright owner,\" sec § 501(b), that is, unless she is receiving royalties from the grantee. See Fantasy v. Fogerty, 654 F. Supp. 1129, 1131 (N.D. Cal. 1987) (defining \"beneficial owner\" as \"an author who had parted with legal title to the copyright in exchange for percentage royalties based on sales or license fees"}]}