{"has_more":false,"total_items":4,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2002,"volume":46,"authors":[{"author_name":"See Voss V Apl Co Pte Ltd"}],"doi":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474225243.ch-006"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Such as 'shipped by any person or persons to be delivered to order or assigns"},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Such wording includes 'non-transferable' or 'non-negotiable"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2008,"journal":"The uncertainty of the common law 'document of title' status of straight bills in English law stems, at least in part, from Kum v Wah Tat Bank [1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep 439 (PC) 446, where Lord Devlin suggested that it had never been settled. However, cf the obiter remarks of Rix LJ in The Rafaela S CA (n 98) [145]. See also, for Australia, Beluga Shipping GmbH & Co v Headway Shipping Ltd"}]}