{"has_more":true,"total_items":61,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2014,"journal":"GEO. WASH. L. REV","volume":82,"page_from":370,"title":"A Concise Guide to Using Dictionaries from the Founding Era to Determine the Original Meaning of the Constitution","authors":[{"author_name":"See Gregory"},{"author_name":"E Maggs"}],"page_to":71},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2011,"journal":"CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALISM: A DEBATE","volume":1,"page_from":34,"title":"We Are All Originalists Now","authors":[{"author_name":"Lawrence B Solum"}],"page_to":35},{"vg_id":0,"authors":[{"author_name":"E G See"},{"author_name":"U S Const"}]},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":2002,"journal":"REV","volume":239,"page_from":271,"title":"As it turns out, defining the founding-era legal meaning of \"breach of the peace\" is far more difficult than one might expect. See Thomas Y. Davies, The Fictional Character of Law-and-Order Originalism: A Case Study of the Distortions and Evasions of Framing-Era Arrest Doctrine in Atwater v","page_to":300}]}