{"has_more":true,"total_items":24,"items":[{"vg_id":0,"published_date":1992,"journal":"Federal Constitutional Court, Federal Republic of Germany: International law and the Law of the European Communities 1951-1989 (pt. I)","volume":270,"authors":[{"author_name":" Bundesverfassungsgericht"}]},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":1974,"journal":"/73 of the ICC -an English version is available","volume":386,"doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(74)80017-1"},{"vg_id":0,"published_date":1984,"journal":"The European Court and National Courts. Doctrine and Jurisprudence","volume":170,"page_from":147,"title":"claimed the primacy of EC law together with the existence of hard core of untouchable national principles. One of the most interesting cases is the Danish one, (see the Carlsen decision, Højesteret, Carlsen v Rasmussen, [1999] 3 CMLR 854), where the Supreme Court adopted a similar position, and clarified its implications. On the Italian and German Constitutional Courts' doctrines see: F. Ruggeri Laderchi","page_to":170},{"vg_id":0,"journal":"Report on Germany","page_from":77,"authors":[{"author_name":"J Kokott"}],"page_to":132}]}